|Correspond with us, including our executive editor, professor Yves A. Isidor, via electronic mail:|
|email@example.com; by way of a telephone: 617-852-7672.|
|Want to send this page or a link to a friend? Click on mail at the top of this window.|
Must learnedly read, too; in part, of intellectual rigor
|Posted Wednesday, March 13, 2008|
|Stronger Rules for Mortgages Are Proposed|
By EDMUND L. ANDREWS
WASHINGTON The nations top economic policymakers, hoping to prevent a repeat of the excesses that led to the mortgage bubble and bust, on Thursday proposed a broad series of reforms aimed at tightening oversight of financial institutions.
The changes include tougher disclosure requirements for banks and Wall Street firms, a nationwide licensing system for mortgage brokers and new rules for credit rating agencies, which have been widely criticized for failing to recognize major problems with mortgage-backed securities and for having potential conflicts of interest.
This effort is not about finding excuses or scapegoats, said Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr., who outlined the proposals in a speech here on Thursday morning. But poor judgment and poor market practices led to mistakes by all participants.
The recommendations were developed by the Presidents Working Group on Financial Markets, a group that includes the Treasury Secretary, the chairman of the Federal Reserve and the governments top financial regulators.
Mr. Paulson said the government was going to demand greater transparency from banks and Wall Street firms, stronger risk management and capital management and a better trading system for complex financial derivatives, such as collateralized debt obligations, that managed to transform risky subprime mortgages into securities with Triple-A ratings.
Echoing measures that Congressional Democrats have been drafting, the presidential group called for tougher state and federal regulation of mortgage lenders and a nationwide set of licensing and registration standards for mortgage brokers.
That reflects a widespread criticism by many experts and policymakers, who have argued that millions of mortgages were originated by independent mortgage brokers who often had no concern about credit quality because they simply passed the mortgages to finance companies that in turn resold them to Wall Street firms and ultimately investors around the world.
Mr. Paulson took particular aim at credit-rating agencies, such as Moodys, Standard & Poors and Fitch, which gave AAA ratings to billions of dollars in mortgage-backed securities that turned out to be filled with delinquent loans.
Mr. Paulson said the rating agencies would have enforce policies about disclosing their conflicts of interest, an allusion to criticisms that the agencies were typically paid for their ratings by the investment banks who only paid once they had sold their securities to investors.
In addition, Mr. Paulson said the presidents group would push the rating agencies to clearly differentiate between the ratings for complicated structured investment products, which investors may not have understood, and the ratings for more conventional corporate bonds and municipal securities.
Issuers of mortgage-backed securities, in turn, would be required to disclose more granular information about the quality of the underlying loans and their procedures for verifying the information in those loans. Mr. Paulson offered few details on how the rules might work and some of his recommendations amounted to little more than demands that investors and financial institutions take greater care in analyzing and managing their risks,
No silver bullet exists to prevent past excesses from recurring, Mr. Paulson said, adding that the recommendations were a good start and that the administration would release a regulatory blueprint in the next few weeks.
Senator Charles E. Schumer, the New York Democrat who is a member of the Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs and Finance committees, was both positive and critical about the proposals, saying in a statement: The administration is finally moving towards where Congress was last year. The good news is, theyre beginning to put their toe in the water when it comes to government involvement to help the economy.
The bad news is, theyre going to have to do a lot more than that to address the problem. We need government action not only to solve the current crisis, but also to prevent a future one.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company. Reprinted from The New York Times, National, of Thursday, March 13, 2008.
|Wehaitians.com, the scholarly journal of democracy and human rights|
|More from wehaitians.com|